Please Note: This Article is 7 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

Former teachers Fergus Wilson and his wife, Judith, dubbed Britain’s buy-to-let “king and queen”, of Peens Lane, Boughton, Monchelsea, were ordered to pay council tax by Maidstone Magistrates’ Court.

[blockquote align=’right’]Council Tax Payments: “Landlords & Managing Agents should keep Councils Informed of all Tenancy Changes Immediately”- [/blockquote]

Two of Britain’s most controversial and arguably, biggest private residential landlords, Fergus and Judith Wilson, accumulated approximately 900 homes in Kent during and post the UK’s property boom.

They hit the headlines recently when they decided not to renew tenancies for around 200 of their housing benefit tenants, claiming that they preferred eastern European migrants who they said defaulted much less frequently than single mums on welfare. They said the decision was purely an economic one based on rent payment records.

More recently they were reputedly in negotiations with both Chinese and American wealth fund investors with a view to disposing of their total portfolio for a figure said to be in the region of £250 million. With around 50% of the portfolio’s value mortgaged, that would leave them around £125 million in pocket.

Judith Wilson was due to attend Maidstone Magistrates’ Court but failed to turn up after her 66 year old husband, Fergus Wilson, requested to move the date of the hearing, as he was filming for a BBC Panorama programme.

Mrs Wilson was found guilty on 10 counts of non-payment of council tax for homes which form part of their portfolio, and fined a total of £3,848 for the nine properties involved.

The court was told that Maidstone Borough Council had contacted Mrs Wilson on a number of occasions but that Mr Wilson had said it was not their responsibility to pay.

Commenting on the matter of council tax payments on rental properties, Tom Entwistle of LandlordZONE said:

Landlords and managing agents should keep councils informed of all tenancy changes immediately.

This will allow the council to make proper calculations on apportionments between landlords and tenants, send out correct bills, and award any discounts or exemptions due promptly. Councils will not usually register tenants for a retrospective period.

It’s all about communication and following the rules, things should never get to this stage when dealing with council tax liabilities.

Councils need to know, ideally in writing: all changes in tenancy start and end dates; full names of each tenant and previous and forwarding addresses; contact telephone numbers landlord and tenant; and whether the property is rented furnished or unfurnished. Many of the councils now have forms on their websites for landlords and agents to keep the council informed about their tenancies.

Landlords are liable to a fine if the required information is not provided within 21 days of the request. In my experience as a landlord it never pays to get into legal fights with councils unless you know you are on very firm ground.

When a property becomes vacant, council tax liability reverts back to the landlord. How much the landlord pays will depend on the status of the property. Most councils will give a discount, for example 25%, if the property is left furnished between tenancies, until the next tenant moves in.

When the property is left unfurnished between tenancies, landlords may qualify for a 100% discount for a maximum of six months, but this does vary between councils and some cash strapped councils are resisting giving these discounts.

In a property rented on a multi-occupation basis the landlord will be liable for the council tax which will be paid on behalf of all the tenants, unless they are all full time students, in which case they are exempt.

Where a property is unfurnished and uninhabitable, and requires major structural work to make it habitable, landlords may qualify for an exemption for up to one year. This will usually require an inspection by the council concerned. Don’t delay in claiming as this exemption will not normally be back-dated.

If a tenant leaves owning council tax, providing the landlord has correctly informed the council at the start of the tenancy, the tenant is liable for council tax. Should they fall into arrears during the tenancy, any debt will remain in their name and not stay with the property or be transferred to the landlord, providing the council is informed promptly when the tenancy starts and ends.

With an assured shorthold tenancy (AST), if a tenant does not occupy the property during the tenancy term as their main residence then the tenancy technically is no longer an AST (it’s a common law tenancy) and the council tax liability falls back on the landlord. It’s then up to the landlord to claim it back from their tenant.

Please Note: This Article is 7 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


  1. (Council Tax Administration & enforcement Regulations 1992 Part ll sec 3, para 1 & 2) , The stipulation falls upon the council to request information from the legal owner or landlord to provide details of the occupants if any. Prior to sending any bills (Unsolicited goods & service Act 1971) If the information is requested by the council then the owner or landlord are obliged to give the information. This is important as it covers the owners/landlord against falling foul of Data protection rules. ( this is a small point but non the less a valid one. Most landlords come under Data Protection meaning you can not just give details of tenants even to local government without the official request or on a willy nilly basis)

    If the legal owner or landlord fail to respond within the allocated time stated, then the council can legally bill the owners/ landlord. (problems arise when councils only send the questionnaire or bill to the rental address, if you have a tenant you will be lucky to see the letter in time to respond)

    I suspect that is where Wilson\’s went wrong, provided the information of liability was first requested, claiming its not your responsibility is not sufficient, and legal liability falls upon you don’t tell the council who is responsible. However if Mr Wilson\’s council just sent him bills without first requesting information from him to establish responsibility, then he should appeal the court ruling. Councils act out side the law if they send a bill directly to a landlord or owner without first establishing that responsibility does in fact fall to upon them.

    The LandlordZONE guide above in regards to making it seem like landlords should tell councils immediately when there\’s a tenant change, is incorrect, however it will keep a landlord out of trouble from council tax bills.
    The trouble is councils get use to this then simple send bills to landlords, as many will be sent to what is often the tenanted address the mail does not get to the landlord, this can lead to a bill becoming overdue and an unbeknown court case which could lead to a prison sentence.

    My advise to landlords is to inform the head of the council tax collection department of all councils of your contact address, together with a statement that they ensure their actions comply with the regulations and certainly prior to sending any bill in your name.

    Ref: (Council Tax Administration & enforcement Regulations 1992 Part ll sec 3, para 1 & 2)
    Ref: “Unsolicited goods & service Act 1971\”
    Ref: Local Government Ombudsman

    Norwich landlord KB


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here