Please Note: This Article is 9 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

Following the appeal court ruling in the recent Superstrike v. Rodrigues case, which threw the industry into something of a stew over the deposit protection rules, some guidance has now been published jointly by the managers of the four deposit schemes in England and Wales.

The Court held that as a statutory periodic tenancy arising under s5 of the Housing Act 1988 is a new tenancy. Many in the industry had assumed that it was a continuation of an existing fixed term tenancy, and therefore needed no further action regarding the deposit. This clearly now is not the case.

Not only does the ruling affect tenancies started before April 2007, which many people thought were exempt the deposit rules, it also brought into doubt the position regarding renewals and tenancies which become statutory periodic post April 2007.

The guidance now issued is available on the four schemes’ websites:

In England and Wales, if you rent out a residential property on an assured shorthold tenancy, and you take a deposit from your tenant, you must place it in one of the following tenancy deposit protection (TDP) schemes. The information they have issued is here:

• Deposit Protection Service (Custodial and Insured)
• MyDeposits
• Tenancy Deposit Scheme
• Capita Tenancy Deposit Protection

The main points are:

1 At the end of the fixed term, check with the deposit protection scheme you used to make sure the protection is current and re-serve the prescribed (s213) notice on your tenant – available for the scheme website. Don’t forget you need proof of service.

2 When you renew a tenancy, or when it becomes a statutory periodic tenancy, re-check with the deposit scheme and re-serve the statutory notice.

3 If your tenancy has already been renewed or become periodic without completing step 2 then you could be in breach of the rules. This has still not been defined and awaits a further court decision on this point.

4 Landlords are advised to seek legal advice on point 3, but common sense should prevail here by taking sensible measures to protect yourself, to either:

a. Check the protection registration again and re-serve the prescribed information now, even though it’s late, in an attempt to mitigate your penalty if in the event it does arise as an issue, or

b. Leave the service of the prescribed information until just before you decide to serve a section 21 notice.

The choice is yours and of course the risk is yours.

If you are in position where you never protected the deposit at all, you won’t be able to use the possession procedure, unless you can persuade your tenant to accept a full refund of the deposit. There still doubt about your position if you just send off the money and the tenant does not bank it. Of course in this situation you will still be subject to a fine.

This whole episode is a complete fiasco and must be a total embarrassment to the last Labour Government which introduced this wonky legislation.

See also: Tenancy Deposit Schemes

By Tom Entwistle,

LandlordZONE® ID2059

If you have any questions about any of the issues here, post your question to the LandlordZONE® Forums – these are the busiest Rental Property Forums in the UK – you will have an answer in no time at all.

©LandlordZONE All Rights Reserved – never rely totally on these general guidelines which apply primarily to England and Wales. They are not definitive statements of the law. Before taking action or not, always do your own research and/or seek professional advice with the full facts of your case and all documents to hand.

Please Note: This Article is 9 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here