The first rogue landlord to be handed a banning order in the UK could face jail after being convicted of ignoring it.

David Beattie was banned from letting properties in September 2019 after being prosecuted by Telford & Wrekin Council for managing an HMO in Dudmaston without a licence and for deliberately misleading tenants over their rights by telling them they could be evicted within 48 hours. At a tribunal hearing, Beattie was deemed not to be a fit and proper person to hold an HMO licence.

He has now admitted breaching the order when he appeared at Shropshire Magistrates’ Court which heard that although the ban remains in force until August 2024, Beattie ignored it and let out a property in Woodside between June and November 2020. Sentencing has been adjourned to 18th October.

The council’s cabinet member for enforcement, community safety and customer services, councillor Richard Overton (pictured), says: “We are extremely disappointed that Mr Beattie chose to ignore the banning order, and we want this to be a reminder that we take such matters very seriously.

- Advertisement -

“Protecting the people in our borough and ensuring they have a safe place to live is at the forefront of everything we do.”

Banning orders prohibit landlords from renting out residential accommodation, engaging in letting agency work or property management work.

They also prohibit holding an HMO licence or a licence granted under a selective licensing scheme.

A banning order lasts for at least 12 months and the landlord’s name goes on the national database of rogue landlords. If convicted for breaching a banning order, they can be imprisoned or fined while councils can also impose a civil penalty of up to £30,000 as an alternative to prosecution.

Read more about Beattie’s previous court appearances.

Pic credits: Google Streetview/Facebook

4 COMMENTS

  1. I think you know the answer! At a glance it looks like the database of rogue landlords is confidential to the local housing authorities. Joe Public can’t just look at it if he wants to rent a house (though most of the victims of rogue landlords probably would never have a clue it existed – based on watching the various TV shows on this, most are illegal immigrants who barely speak English). It’s also quite an administrative burden. A rogue tenants’ register sounds good in theory, but it would be hundreds of times larger than the rogue tenants database and a massive administrative task well beyond the abilities of our government

  2. A Tenant Referencing Passport would be far more effective but the TFA doesn’t currently permit LL to request this.

    A TRP would provide accurate referencing.
    A tenant would only need one reference to be updated as and when a new tenancy is sought.

    Of course such TRP would reveal all those feckless rent defaulting tenants that cost LL over £9 billion of losses per year.
    Most of it caused by rent defaulting.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here