Rogue landlords in Barking and Dagenham had to stump up more than £317,000 in fines last year.

The council, which was the first in the UK to mandate all its PRS properties to be licensed, issued 117 civil penalty notices totalling £271,310 and 89 enforcement notices totalling over £46,000.

It also investigated 99 cases of illegal eviction and handled 122 cases of landlord harassment in the last 12 months – a significant rise on the year before the pandemic.

In one instance, council enforcement officers received a tip off about an unlicensed overcrowded property in Mayfair Avenue, where 13 people were found living in a four-bedroom house.


Fourteen joint operations were also carried out with the Met Police, including one where the unlicensed HMO in Reede Road was being used as a brothel. The landlord is now awaiting a court hearing.

- Advertisement -
barking selective licencing landlords mulhane

Councillor Margaret Mullane (pictured), cabinet member for enforcement and community safety, says most landlords in the borough understand their responsibilities – both legally and morally – to their tenants.

However, she adds: “There are unfortunately some unsavoury landlords who choose to flout the rules, and that is where we will use all the legal powers available to us to take action to improve living conditions for our residents.”

Since the borough-wide scheme launched in 2019 there have been about 15,000 applications for licences, although it is thought a quarter of all housing in the borough is private rented accommodation.

Read more about selective licensing.


  1. So, they have taken action against circa 200 landlords which represents 1.3% of the total of 15,000 properties under the scheme each paying £900 per property! That’s a cost of over £13.5m to recover a few hundred grand or £65,000 per prosecution thus far. Even the councilor admits most landlords do the right thing. This is typical of the majority being penalised for the actions of a tiny minority. Meantime, I would be pretty sure rents increased as a consequence. I just don’t understand why these councils get away with it. By anyone’s estimation, this is just a daft scheme.

Leave a Reply to M Byrne Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here