Please Note: This Article is 2 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

The Government is set to make an announcement on short-lets regulations – just as the sector prepares to re-open its doors after the lockdown.

MPs are studying a new House of Commons Library briefing document discussing calls for greater regulation and will soon scrutinise a ‘white paper’ of recommendations from Airbnb when it publishes its UK roadshow findings later this month.

The platform has talked to hosts, communities and politicians across the UK about its proposals for a simple statutory registration system for short-term rentals.

Automated lettings payment platform PayProp believes that the results of Airbnb’s consultations – as well as their planned white paper – could be crucial to the future of the industry. Group chief sales officer, Neil Cobbold, says: “Implemented effectively, a short-term lets registration system could help the sector to professionalise without introducing too much red tape.”

He adds that reports of the 90-day rule in London being flouted regularly, means its effectiveness needs to be reviewed. “What’s more, as the popularity of short-term lets grows in other cities across the country, similar limits may need to be considered elsewhere,” Cobbold says.

The Commons document highlights a lack of taxation compliance by short-term landlords, the impact on local housing markets, and health and safety issues. However, the Government has no plans to ban the use of residential property for short-term lets and has been reluctant to pass further legislation.

The document also points to Office of National Statistics which estimates that 20% of adults used sites or apps such as Airbnb last year. It reports: “In 2017, Airbnb altered its booking system to automatically limit entire home listings in London to 90 nights per calendar year. However, there are various ways for short-term accommodation providers to circumvent these automatic restrictions.”

Please Note: This Article is 2 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


  1. Doesn’t this incompetent Govt realise that mist short-term lettings are fraudulent!!?

    Very few such lettings are compliant with
    Lender conditions
    Insurance conditions
    Planning conditions
    Leasehold conditions
    Freeholder conditions.

    If all these conditions are satisfied then a short-term letting licence could be granted.
    If this situation was instituted there would be very few short-term lettings!!

  2. I don’t see how these short lets can in practice be differentiated from FHLs (Furnished Holiday lets — “holiday cottages”)which have to be available to let for 210 days in a year and actually let for 105days — what happens to a 90 day limit? FHLs have to be specifically let for a holiday but if a customer says he is coming for a holiday we have to accept this. We cannot sit outside the property to see whether he leaves each day at 6.45 am wearing a suit. If our bureaucrats want to interfere in and regulate this area of business they should at least try to produce sensible regulations, which is unlikely as civil servants seem to be congenitally incompetent.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here