Please Note: This Article is 2 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

More details of the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill have been released to parliament including a new streamlined system for broadband providers to gain access to apartment blocks.

Landlords could soon be forced to allow broadband providers into their buildings under planned legislation.

The Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill aims to address the issue that about 40% of requests to access apartment blocks to install updates are currently ignored.

It should ensure tenants living in blocks of flats and apartments get access to the latest generation of broadband and is going through the Lords on its way to becoming law.

Speaking in The House, Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under Secretary for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, said: “We understand from the likes of Openreach, Virgin Media, CityFibre, Gigaclear and other major telecoms providers that around 40% of their requests for access in such situations receive no response.”

Four million missing out

She said it was unacceptable that operators were forced to bypass these properties which left some four million people missing out.

The new Bill would give operators a new streamline process through the courts to gain rights to install their infrastructure; under the current court system it can cost about £14,000 per application and take six or seven months to gain access.

Under the new system, once a tenant requests a service, the operator must have issued three notices to the landlord requesting access over 28 days, plus a final notice explicitly referencing the fact that the court may be used to gain access.

Only after that can the operator apply to a court for rights to access the property. A landlord can stop the process at any point by responding to one of the notices.

Baroness Barran added: “This application process is intended to be a last resort for operators. We hope that through the passing and implementation of this legislation, landowner response rates will increase, and this new court process will, over time, not even need to be used.”

Please Note: This Article is 2 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


  1. I’ve had asphalt walkways cut into by sky and other dish installers who couldn’t give a monkeys about the damage caused by their cabling. We ended up re-asphalting a very large area because we couldn’t find out where the water was getting in and the cost was enormous. Hence we don’t give permissions and wayleaves on blocks with asphalt walkways; and require very detailed drawings showing the exact cable route before considering any others.

  2. I can see this leading to heafty claims against installers , generally speaking they have little if any experience in compartmentalisation, fire control and rarely repair damage they cause when drilling through walls and frames. Once installed who will be responsible for the cabling if it needs re routing , moving or encasing what happens when the cabling is no longer required who pays for the rectification of any damage, who accepts liability if the cable becomes a hazard and someone falls or trips over it .These additional costs and risks should not fall onto the landlord. Looks like it may be time to update contracts to advise tenants that any service they have installed is their responsibility to maintain and any costs involved that require the service to be moved will be at their expense. Another issue is access, they may need to run cables through other properties in the block, that’s not going to go down to well with other tenants if they end up with trunking running across their walls and ceiling or chases cut into their walls , who’s going to cover the costs of any rectification works.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here