Please Note: This Article is 2 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

Recently-arrived Chief Executive says one of the organisations first jobs will be to look at whether selective and additional property licensing schemes truly deliver the benefits claimed for them, based on the facts.

The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has said that it is to focus its efforts on persuading ministers and local authorities that property licensing schemes do not raise standards and that, particularly for HMOs, they are thinly disguised revenue raising efforts.

Ben Beadle, the newly-formed organisation’s recently-arrived Chief Executive, made the comments during a webinar held by property legal expert Tessa Sanderson as part of her ongoing online conference.

“The UK seems hell bent on introducing legislation to regulate the housing market when often the measures are already in place,” he said.

“Take licensing – all of the things that landlords need to do in order to get a licence are already legal requirements including gas, electrical, fire safety and smoke detector rules – so why do you need a licence to hold it all together?

“The argument is that licensing raises standards and makes it easier for local authorities to enforce the rules, but I don’t really see an evidence to support this claim and the NRLA will be taking a very close look at licensing and assessing the impact, based on the facts.”

Beadle also says that landlords have become an easy target for legislators including licensing, despite many local authorities claiming it’s ‘not about the money’.

“If it’s not about the money, why does it cost up to £1,000 per property for a licence within some schemes,” he says.

“This is a source of great contention for landlords and it’s an issue that the NRLA is absolutely going to pick up and run with.”

Please Note: This Article is 2 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


  1. Does not matter one bit about the evidence. Where is the evidence landlords are evicting tenants en-mass for no reason other than to raise the rent, but they still are banning section 21. Where is the evidence landlords were buying up all the housing stock, yet they still went ahead with Osborne’s punitive reforms. The state will do what they want, either to raise revenue or for political gain because they know there will be little sympathy from voters or politicians from either side. And the next example of this will be the state letting renters off the hook for arrears at the expense of landlords.

  2. Someone must stop local authorities from charging these outrageous amounts of money for the so-called “Selective Licensing”. We are fully compliant and for the second time in 4 years, have to pay £521.00 for what? (it was over £600 last time)
    Eventually, they will send someone round to inspect the property, then issue another license.
    I fully agree with councils enforcing the correct standards but charge the landlords who continually fail to meet those standards, not us law abiding landlords who are really struggling to avoid making losses rather than a small profit. This is a blatant and disgusting way of raising revenue from already over taxed and hard pressed landlords who are simply proving housing which the authorities have failed to do.

Leave a Reply to John Mears Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here