Viewpoint by Tom EntwistleAs winter approaches outside temperatures drop and the perennial landlord's problem of winter condensation and black mould rear their ugly heads again.The question is, how do you know if this is caused by the building or the tenant, or is it a combination of the two?Dampness or condensation symptoms are very similar but the cures are very different, and to the uninitiated applying the wrong methods can be both expensive and ineffective.When tenants start to complain about 'damp'� to their letting agents and landlords, you need to have some answers.What's more, condensation and damp have a bearing on evictions and in particular the issue of the so called Section 21 "revenge eviction" which landlords need to be well award of.
I've had many years dealing with these problems in residential as well as commercial properties and in that time I've begun to develop a good understanding of this tricky problem and how to deal with it '� in this article I will attempt to answer these questions and provide some solutions.Despite many articles I've seen written on the subject, it's not generally very well understood.There's a lot of misunderstanding around it, and even some so called 'experts'� get it wrong.Mention damp and black mould, and we've all seen those nasty pictures in print and in the television documentaries, and immediately the landlord is denounced; he or she becomes the pariah figure who is condemning tenants to live in appalling health-threatening conditions.Yes, it's true that some properties have such serious defects that they are prone to damp and condensation and their owners need to put them right.But far more common is a situation where the root-cause of the problem is the way the tenants are living, or sometimes it's a combination of that and inadequacies with the property.The problems landlords have is that tenants, the general public, environmental health officers (EHO), solicitors and judges in court, very often just don't understand the difference between damp and condensation, their root causes, and who is really at fault.What causes condensation?Tenants often report dampness in a property when in fact the black mould on the walls and musty smells on clothes are caused by condensation.Condensation occurs when warm moisture laden air meets a cold surface. Typical is when steamy air from cooking, washing and drying clothes rises up to the top of the house and meets a cold surface; easily visible as water droplets on window pains and tiles, but less so when the moisture meets cold wall paper, plastered walls, carpets and clothes in wardrobes in unheated rooms. Then it is invisible, quickly absorbed into these materials and results in that cold musty smell and mould spores.So, there are two main causes of condensation:1 '� Too much steam and moisture laden air that rises through the house rather than being vented outside at source; usually from the kitchen or bathroom, or typically when clothes are left to dry on radiators.2 '� A house with rooms that are far too cold.VentilationWhen steam is produced it should be vented out of the house in the room where it is produced, by opening windows, using permanent vents or extractor fans, and closing doors to prevent it circulating round the house.The problem is that opening windows in winter is not something people want to do as it cools the room, and providing permanent air vents does the same thing. I've seen many vents purposely blocked with rags by occupants.It does not help that the modern house, with all our draft proofing measures, unlike the old days with chimney ventilation, becomes a hermetically sealed box, so even new houses suffer some condensation.Rooms too ColdIt's always the coldest rooms where condensation happens and black mould appears, usually tops of walls in bedrooms which receive the least heating.Very often it's simply a matter of not providing enough heat in the house, either to save money, because the occupants can't afford to heat, or because the heating system is not up to it.When the house is poorly insulated, as in many older properties without cavity walls, heating is expensive because a lot of it is being wasted. Then, lack of heat leads to colder and colder moisture absorbing walls and more and more condensation. It becomes a vicious cycle.Tenanted properties are particularly prone as most tenants are trying to economise; out all day they have little or no heating, then in the evening they blast the place with steam from cooking and washing.A really well insulated and heated house will rarely suffer much condensation because everything including carpets, wall paper and clothes in wardrobes are all nice and warm and will not absorb moisture, even when some steam is generated.Interstitial CondensationA technical term used to describe what happens when condensation remains a problem for a long time. The cold walls absorb more and more moisture which penetrates deep into the walls; the wall paper, plaster and masonry, and even timber, which will eventually lead to dry rot. The moisture is so deep it will take months to dry the building out, even when more than adequate heating is applied.Likewise mould spores will develop on surfaces which eventually become toxic (causing a real health hazard) and are hard to eradicate.So, once these conditions have been allowed to develop they can be very difficult to reverse; they do a lot of damage to the fabric of the building and they are a serious health issue for occupants and anyone attempting to clean up.DampnessDampness is different to condensation and has different causes which are invariably defects in the building and most definitely a landlord issue. These are not difficult to spot and eliminate: a leaking roof, gutters and downspouts, rising damp in the lower parts of ground floor walls and floors in basements, or a leaking water pipe. All these will create a localised problem and will appear different to condensation and mould.Older properties and insulationMany rental properties fall into the older category and are without cavity walls and modern insulation standards. The Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) gives an indication of this when a tenant enters into a tenancy.The Government has announced changes to the Energy Bill to include a new law introducing a legal minimum energy efficiency standards for homes rented from landlords from 2018. They have also announced the introduction of measures from 2016, to allow councils and tenants to demand energy efficiency measures from landlords.This means that one-in-ten buy-to-let homes will be unlettable in four years' time unless their landlords take steps to improve their property's energy efficiency.Tenants will also be able to demand improvements to insulation from 2016, when landlords will not be able to refuse tenants' "reasonable" requests for energy efficiency measures.The legislation states that landlords must not let out properties with the two lowest energy efficiency ratings, F and G, after April 2018 at the latest. According to a recent English Housing Survey, 11.4pc of homes in the private rented sector were rated F or G in 2011.The flagship government-backed loan scheme, The Green Deal, to help people give their homes green makeovers has been "disappointing", the UK energy and climate change secretary has conceded.This, it appears, is because the funding is expensive relative to other ways of doing this, and in general landlords are advised to make their own arrangements for bringing their properties up to modern insulation standards before these legal deadlines come in and make the letting illegal.Revenge EvictionsRevenge or retaliatory evictions have been in the news recently, and although it appears many of the claims that landlords evict tenants just because they complain of the need for repairs have been exaggerated, nevertheless it is an issue.It has resulted in the Coalition Government supporting a private member's Bill to be introduced by Sarah Teather, though an adverse response from landlording bodies has now prompted a Government short enquiry.Her proposal is that the use of section 21 should be limited when environmental health officers (EHO) deem the property to have serious defects and health and safety hazards, damp, condensation and mould being one of these.Really bad conditions are largely confined to a small proportion of rogue landlords who for the want of a better term, let slums.But all good landlords ought to be concerned about the proposals because damp, condensation and mould is so difficult to pin down to a cause '� it can just as easily be the tenant as much as the building and landlord.The concern is that if not handled very carefully, this proposed change will adversely affect ALL landlords as it will bring in a fundamental change in the tenant-landlord balance in housing tenure law.Currently two restrictions are imposed on the section 21 process: licencing and deposit rules. For both of these the landlord is still in control '� follow the rules and they retain control, that's fair enough. Sarah Teather's change will take the control out of the landlord's hands and give this to the judgement of Environmental Health Officers (EHO) and the courts.This has the potential to cause serious issues for ALL landlords because:
By way of example: a recent case cited in the Letting Update Journal (Oct 2014) was of a tenant who refused to ventilate even though the radiators were covered in wet drying clothes. The property was covered in black mould even though it had been free of condensation problems with previous tenants. The tenant violently refused to follow advice and brought in the local authority Environment Health Officer.After the inspection the EHO came up with a long list of modifications and 'improvements'� that the property needed, even though it had been fully refurbished before this tenancy, which included moving radiators, building a new internal wall and replacing a large bay window.On appeal it seems the report was modified with more emphasis placed on the tenant's responsibility in the issue, but nevertheless it illustrates the difficulties landlords will face with inexperienced EHOs, as this lady clearly was, if Sarah Teather's rule becomes law.In my experience a large percentage of the time condensation is caused by the tenant: (1) saving on heating costs and living in a cold house, (2) not ventilating when washing and cooking, (3) drying clothes on radiators etc.Try to convince tenants, some EHOs, some judges and the general public that this is not the landlord's fault and you are met with pure cynicism and you really are up against a serious lack of knowledge and understanding on the issue.I've seen this problem develop with tenants from all socio-economic groups, so it's not confined to the bottom end of the letting market. But often you will never convince the tenant or the authorities of the real cause unless they are experienced or you can show that previous tenants in the property never had an issue with condensation.My concern with the Bill is that there is a danger of introducing a process where good landlords just cannot get fair treatment; cannot easily resolve these situations quickly when it's costing them money in repairs / rent payment disputes, and where, given time, landlords will simply realise that letting is just not worth the hassle.Damp specialistsBeware the damp specialists who come into a condensation riddled property with their two pronged meter, showing you just how much dampness the wall contains. Of course it does, because the condensation has well and truly soaked in over time, but their suggested remedies will often be very expensive and ineffective.Advice for your tenants:The incidence of condensation can be reduced by:
Advice for landlords
Advice for DisputesLandlord-tenant disputes are unfortunate but an occupational hazard for all landlords. It's also unfortunate that many tenancies start off really well and over time deteriorate into poor relationships for no particular reason apart from resentment creeping in, for one reason or another. As Robin Williams said in the film Dead Poets Society, ''�T'was always thus, and always thus shall be!'�Relations can get very strained and when a certain point is reached, persistent rent arrears and late payments, damage to the property, or anti-social behaviour, for example, it is not unreasonable for a private landlord to start eviction proceedings. Social landlords can afford to be and usually are much more tolerant of all of this; private landlords usually can't afford it.However, tenants will sometimes bring up issues in a defence against eviction. The defence can range from finding technical errors in the way the landlord has served notices, or completed court papers, to defects with the property, whether real or imagined, notified or not.Under the present system the landlord can be faced with a defence immediately before or during a court hearing when it's too late to do anything about it. Claims of disrepair will usually mean a deferred trial date, sometimes 6 months hence, with a request for expert reports on the conditions.The up-shot is a long and expensive legal process is in train where the loser pays all costs.10 key tips for resolving disputes and winning your case
Documentary evidence is the key to winning any court action '� judges will not take a landlord's word against that of the tenant, so you must back-up your assertions with good solid evidence. This will be even more important in future if Sarah Teather's Bill becomes law.LandlordZONE� DocumentsPrivate Rented Sector Energy Efficiency RegulationsRevenge Evictions - short enquiry