Sandwell Council in the West Midlands has signed off on Additional Licensing for HMO properties, one of several to be announced in recent weeks across England.

Its cabinet has given the scheme a green light following a 12-week consultation, which will see all HMOs within West Bromwich town centre and beyond to be licenced, rather than just large ones housing five or more people.

Under the scheme, which will go live in April, landlords of all HMOs regardless of how many people are living there will need to apply for a licence at a cost of £850 for a five-year period. This will not be the most expensive scheme – Lambeth in London recently introduced a similar one with fees of up to £2,024 per property.

It is expected that councillors will today vote through the licensing plans which – following feedback from landlords, tenants, residents, businesses and local and national campaign groups – was supported by three-quarters of those canvassed.

However among the approximately 600 people canvassed, 61% of landlords disagreed with the scheme, half thought it would have a negative impact and 80% said the proposed fees are unreasonable.

The council claims that, although there are ‘numerous high-quality landlords within the borough… some do not provide adequate accommodation or management of their properties’.

Poorly managed

zahoor ahmed sandwell hmo licensing

Councillor Zahoor Ahmed, Sandwell’s cabinet member for housing, says: “We want to improve housing conditions and make sure that landlords are providing good quality and safe HMOs, so that tenants are protected.

“While we know that many already do this, there are still too many properties that are poorly managed and are in unsafe and unsatisfactory conditions.

“A new approach is needed and we believe that the Additional Licensing Scheme will improve the condition of properties, support good landlords and remove rogue landlords from operating.”

But not all agree with this approach – as Rightmove’s legal director recently said at an industry conference that there was little evidence that licensing improved housing stock or landlord behaviour.

“All they have done is divert resources in local authorities who are already cash strapped and overburdened with regulatory administration,” he said.


  1. They believe it will ‘support good landlords and remove rogue landlords from operating’. Has it even occured to them that it might actually do the exact opposite? Piss off good landlords and see them leave the PRS whilst the few rogue landlords will carry on operating… because they are rogue and don’t care.

  2. How does increasing costs for landlords improve housing conditions? The reality is this is just a council seeing landlords as an easy target to steal from.

    If I were letting in the region I’d simply increase all the rents by the cost plus an admin fee and explain to my tenants why . I would suggest more landlords will leave the sector because of this and the reduced availability will lead to further cost increases to tenants


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here