Please Note: This Article is 4 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

Tenant Fees Ban:

With an ever increasing number of under 45s renting privately, it’s almost inevitable that with no stake in property, and with Labour promising radical tenant-friendly legislation, their vote will go only one way.

A new study by Shelter, the homelessness charity, concludes that the growing cohort of private tenants could be just enough to tip the balance electorally and throw the Tories out of power.

For those renting in the private rented sector (PRS), over the last 10 years the 35-44 age group went form 13% to 26%, the 45 to 54 group went from 8% to 14%, and the 55-64 age group 3% to 9%, – see the chart below.

- Advertisement -

Young people are being priced out of the housing market and being forced to rent for longer, and with house prices increasingly out of their reach, some may rent for life.

The low interest rate environment since the 2008 market crash has pushed asset prices sky-high across the Western-world. This including house process.  Also, in Britain, according to one recent report, surging immigration has pushed house prices up by 20%. The result is that more and more under 45s are resigned to renting, if not for life, then a least well into their 30s and 40s.

This structural change has driven a coach and horses through the traditional Tory policy of building a house owning democracy; the Thatcher boom in council house purchases which led to a boost in home ownership, is a trend now in reverse.

This steady decline in house ownership in Britain means that by the next general election, due in 2022, there will be more renters than mortgaged home owners. With a large cohort of 35-44-year-olds now renting, a demographic that’s more likely to turn out to vote than younger tenants, Shelter warns that the Tories must do more to help tenants if they are to retain power.

Shelter fears that the proposed ban on agents’ letting fees, and a cap on security deposits, due for implementation next year, could result in higher charges by other means.  In a determined attempt to offset losses from letting fees, if the ban is not implemented properly, Shelter fears that agents will circumvent the legislation

Polly Neate, Shelter’s chief executive, says:

“In recent years the number of families renting privately has soared, meaning political parties can no longer afford to be tone deaf to the needs of renters and listen only to homeowners.

“It is vital for renters that this government bans letting fees properly, without leaving the back door open to agents to continue charging.

“It’s their main pledge to renters and if they get it wrong they might well feel the consequences at the ballot box in years to come.”

Director of the Renters Alliance, Clark Barrett, has said that letting fees are not the only issue with private renting:

“The main problem we see is not the letting fees, its poor service, its deposits not being returned, and its repairs not being done.

“Banning letting fees will just see landlords pass on the cost to the renter by taking more of the deposit at the end of the tenancy.

“It’s a systemic problem, and the real issue is the shortage of good properties in the rented sector.”

Shelter highlights the growing power of the tenant group at the ballot box by citing data from the British Election survey which shows that in 2017 voter turnout was more than 10% higher for 35-44 year-olds than it was for 25-34 year-olds, at 69% as opposed to 56%.

Renting v Ownership








Source: DWP – Renting & Home Ownership Trends

Please Note: This Article is 4 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


  1. Are you sure there is a housing shortage!!!
    Certainly not in Hull. Prices on the increase, where, not in Hull or North of London.
    Fact is, the younger generation are not savers, they have not saved or started to save for a deposit, priorities have changed, wishing to travel, nice holidays, new cars instead. When they get to 25-30 they realise they can’t afford to buy a house. planning, what planning?

    Does the younger generation want a 2 bedroom terraced house circa 1910? £85-£90,000. Perhaps they want everything new, detached with a drive for the new cars £200.000

    Fake news that more houses are required. Norman Tebbit quoted in the 80’s “Get on your bike and find a job. Wise words, many of did the very thing, move, work in affordable areas.

  2. Well said Steve,
    The ‘ Want to live in an area I can’t afford and pay only the rent for a house I can afford’ ignores market principle – which NO political party can change.
    Pity they weren’t more honest with the voters about it in stead of jockey for their whimsical attention.
    Sooner the better we have Proportional Representation, the better.

  3. We also know the 95% LTV Mortgage deals after the 2008 crash where withdrawn. Most lenders turned to 75% LTV., perhaps the main reason why people believed housing became ‘unaffordable”. Build affordable housing is clearly not the answer as prices after the 2008 crash indicate a drop in value over the preceding years in the North.
    Now we have 90-95% LTV mortgages available since 2015.
    The now new renters may enjoy the freedom of being transient, been able to accept jobs in various areas of the country, not responsible for repairs/maintenance. Will they want to save 5-10% deposit?
    Is it so important you actually own your own home!!

    Perhaps the rented sector could be measured in terms of quality, more like hotels with a star rating system.
    Just like the system adopted in Hull a few years ago. Ahead of its time I know, this should be rolled out throughout the country.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here