Please Note: This Article is 3 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

Rent Controls:

The controversial issue of rent controls, as proposed by Labour and the Mayor of London, divide opinion in both the tenant and the landlord communities. Most landlords are against, while for tenants its often a tempting prospect.

However, according to a round-up of research by the Residential Landlords Association (RLA), rent controls hurt tenants by drying up the supply of homes to rent and in the long run, in many cases by actually increasing rents.

The Mayor of London is calling for the power to introduce rent controls across the capital. This, according to evidence sourced by the RLA, would have a negative impact on tenants. The RLA’s analysis of existing research from around the world it says reveals the harm they can cause. And it gives specific examples:

· Forms of rent control exist in Los Angeles and San Francisco. A paper for the California Budget and Policy Centre has reported that renters are “substantially more likely to struggle with housing affordability than homeowners.” It goes on to note that: “More than half of renter households paid over 30% of income toward housing in 2017, and more than a quarter were severely cost-burdened, paying more than half of household income toward housing costs.” A further paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research has found that in San Francisco, landlords affected by rent control reduced rental housing supply by 15 per cent.

· Research for the National Multi Housing Council in the United States warns that rent control and rent stabilisation laws “lead to a reduction in the available supply of rental housing in a community, particularly through the conversion to ownership of controlled buildings.”

· A document prepared for the European Commission has warned that rent controls “appear to have a significant destabilizing impact on the aggregate housing market, increasing the volatility of house prices when confronted with different shocks.” It goes on to note: “The drawbacks of rent controls in terms of unintended consequences for housing market stability and negative effects on labour mobility would advise against their use for redistribution purpose”.

· In 2015, a rent control mechanism was introduced across Germany. The research cites evidence showing that between 2015 and 2017 rents in central Berlin increased by almost 10 per cent. Before the introduction of the control they had been rising by just one to two per cent each year. Research by the German Institute for Economic Research has concluded: “Contrary to the expectations of the policy makers, the rental brake has, at best, no impact in the short run. At worst, it even accelerates rent increases both in municipalities subject to the rental brake and in neighbouring areas.”

· In Italy, a paper for the Centre for the Analysis of Public Policies notes that the private supply of rental homes fell dramatically after a law regulating rent levels was introduced in 1978. A further paper has found that in Italy between 1998 and 2008, market rents increased by 57 per cent compared to a growth in household income of 31 per cent.

· In Sweden, a report by the International Monetary Fund this year concluded: “Tackling Sweden’s dysfunctional housing market requires reforms of rent controls, tax policies, and construction regulation. In addition to fully liberalizing rents of newly constructed apartments, there is a need to phase out existing controls, such as by applying market rents when there is a change in tenant.”

A senior academic has warned the Greater London Assembly that the Mayor’s proposals for rent controls would have “really dramatic unintended consequences,” the RLA says of Kath Scanlon’s intervention.

Addressing the Assembly’s Budget and Performance committee, Kath Scanlon, assistant professorial research fellow at the London School of Economics, argued that: “Landlords would simply decide they were no longer going to rent their properties.”

Further, The Centre for Cities warned earlier this year that: “Rather than helping make London open to everyone, strict rent control would close off London to new residents and divide the city’s renters into winners and losers.”

David Smith, Policy Director for the Residential Landlords Association, has said:

“This research shows clearly that rent controls are not a panacea for tenants. Far from making renting cheaper, experience around the world shows it can make it more expensive and more difficult for those looking for a home to rent.

“Rather than resorting to simplistic and populist ideas which have shown themselves to fail, the Mayor should instead work with the vast majority of private landlords doing a good job to see what is needed to stimulate the delivery of more homes to rent. Increasing supply is by far the most effective way of keeping rents down.”

The RLA PEARL research paper can be accessed here:

Kath Scanlon’s comments are available here can be found here

The comments from the Centre for Cities can be accessed here

The government mulls the return of rent controls

London Mayor Sadiq Khan favours rent controls in re-election bid

Please Note: This Article is 3 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here