Please Note: This Article is 5 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

MPs and Peers are “bewildered” by the plethora of figures being claimed about Revenge Evictions by campaigning organisations which are opposed by industry bodies.

That’s according to a press release put out Monday by the All Party Parliamentary Group for the Private Rented Sector (APPG).

More needs to be done to establish the scale of the ‘revenge eviction’ problem before the Private Members Bill brought by Sarah Teather is resurrected, say a group of MPs and Peers.

The proposed changes to property tenure legislation under the Bill could “put private landlords off providing more homes”, according to the group of MPs.

- Advertisement -

The proposals under Sarah Teather’s Bill to ban “revenge” or retaliatory evictions, a practice which sees tenants who complain about the state of their property forced to leave their home, failed to pass through the Commons in November.

But the proposed changes brought in the Bill are now to be considered once more as an amendment to the Deregulation Bill to be debated in the Lords in January.

A new report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for the Private Rented Sector says that without more evidence it’s still not clear whether legislation is “necessarily the best tool” to tackle the problem.

“Too often on private rented housing it has become very easy to call for greater regulations here or there without a proper assessment of what is and isn’t working,” the report says.

The group says it heard a “bewildering” variety of different figures during its inquiry into the issue.

Housing charity Shelter is claiming as many as 213,000 tenants faced eviction last year after asking their private landlord for repairs – but others say those figures significantly over-estimate the problem.

“Obtaining objective data that hasn’t been collected by a particular group with a vested interest was impossible,” the report says.

The all-party group says any measures will need to be kept under continued review ‘to ensure that landlords are not put off from investing in the new homes to rent the country needs’.

APPG chair Oliver Colvile MP said:

“Evidence is crucial to making good policy – and at the moment we just don’t have that evidence. If the number of retaliatory evictions is as low as some of those who gave evidence at our inquiry suggested, then Parliament should consider whether making tenants aware of their existing rights might be better than introducing more regulations. If this latest amendment does go ahead, then we will still need good evidence to ensure that we can monitor its success.”

Mr Colvile said the group strongly recommended that the government… collect much more detailed information on why private sector tenants leave their homes. It is also calling for central and local government to work together to ensure effective enforcement of existing regulations and any new legislation affecting the private rented sector. It recommends that if new legislation is passed, safeguards should be put in place to ensure disputes are resolved quickly.

“The vast majority of private landlords offer a good service to their tenants,” said Mr Colvile.

“Given that many of them are small-scale landlords, we need to ensure that further regulations do not deter them from providing much-needed homes.”

Please Note: This Article is 5 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here