Please Note: This Article is 4 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

Rogue Landlords:

A cross-party housing, communities and local government committee report by cross bench MPs into Britain’s private rented sector calls for rogue landlords to have their properties confiscated by local councils.

The report produced by the MPs comes at a time of increasing concern about conditions in which some tenants are living in Britain’s rapidly expanding private rented sector (PRS).

Local authorities across Britain are having varying degrees of success at tackling the Rogue landlords in their boroughs. The committee’s report says that the financial penalties that the authorities impose have proved “meaningless” in deterring the worst rogue landlords and criminal offenders.

Following a recent Resolution Foundation study and report, which concluded that one-in-three UK millennials will never own a home, this report is also calling for more tenant protection from evictions, rent increases and landlord harassment.

It has been estimated that there are 800,000 private rented homes in a non-tenantable condition, with faulty electricals and poor and expensive heating systems, resulting in excess cold, condensation and mould.

Although no recommendations were made regarding rent controls, the MP’s committee called on government to “…give local authorities the power to confiscate properties from those committing the most egregious offences and whose business model relies on the exploitation of vulnerable tenants”.

Evidence presented to the committee showed that in some locations up to 25 tenants could be found sharing living accommodation comprising only three bedrooms, while many were being charged up to £500 “for one bed in a room with four bunkbeds”.

While the study found that some councils had be proactive in tackling the rogue landlord problem, in other boroughs not one single landlord had been prosecuted. This was the case with 6 out of 10 councils and some of the MPs said that that often only £100 or £200 fines were imposed, which they said were “pitiful” amounts, especially as it was costing the local authorities thousands to take landlords to court.

Clive Betts, the Labour MP for Sheffield South East, who chairs the committee, has said:

“The imbalance in power in the private rented sector means vulnerable tenants often lack protection from unscrupulous landlords who can threaten them with retaliatory rent rises and eviction if they complain about unacceptable conditions in their homes.”

The report also says that around 44% of tenants are living in fear of eviction if they make a complaint to their landlord, and something like 200,000 tenants have said they had been physically abused or harassed by their landlord.

However, in its defence, the government has said it has already taken measures to crack down hard on rogue and criminal tenants and under a new regime including fines of up to £30,000, banning orders and rent confiscation orders. It is also working on plans to introduce a PRS housing ombudsman, with new legislation which will make it easier for tenants to bring a legal action against their landlord.

A spokesman for the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government has said:

“Everyone deserves a safe and decent home and we have given councils stronger powers to crack down on bad landlords, including fines of up to £30,000 and banning orders.”

The Residential Landlords Association (RLA), representing 50,000 landlords owning 250,000 homes, told The Guardian newspaper that it welcomed much of the report, but thought that more regulation would not be welcome at this point.

The RLA says that it, “…has long been concerned with the increasing complexity of laws and regulations related to private rented housing, which cause uncertainty for all those in the sector.”

Please Note: This Article is 4 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


  1. “”Evidence presented to the committee showed that in some locations up to 25 tenants could be found sharing living accommodation comprising only three bedrooms, while many were being charged up to £500 “for one bed in a room with four bunkbeds”.””


  2. New legislation in this field – as in all – is of no relevance to those who take no notice of the laws in the first place. And this is the group referred to above.
    I have properties including a fully-licensed HMO in Brighton and my world is very different to this.
    The place meets all standards and I try to keep up with red-tape in this sector. But I have just a month’s rent (seeking more as a deposit on a room is difficult) protecting me from a couple of tenants who prefer to go on holiday and drink rather than pay the rent. I’ve managed to negotiate two out so far at a cost of not so far off £2,000 in total.
    I’m now starting to think I’ll be very selective on who I rent a room to because of these costs. The imbalance in legal power between good landlords and poor tenants is now such that good landlords will get very fussy indeed in terms of who they rent to. This will leave a lot good tenants who don’t have blue-chip credentials out in the cold.
    Or, as I am also starting to do, rents will be raised to cover these costs and the tax we now have to pay on mortgage interest payments. How this is supposed to help good tenants in good rentals is beyond me.

  3. Nothing is said about good Landlords giving us an extremely bad name. We receive probably one of the lowest rents in the land but we have to conform to really expensive rules and regulations. We act on any complaints within 14 days and do everything according to the law. We cannot take any more unnecessary expenditure. Why does not the RLA fight for us? It seems more and more that they are in bed with the government and have forgotten who pays their subs, and in turn their high salaries.

  4. Another comment from me
    The photo shown above. Is it Landlord neglect or tenants not airing their rented property, drying clothes or radiators. Nobody of course will comment. Showing us good Landlords again in a bad light. Fed up of the whole thing. Would sell tomorrow, but if we do we would have to pay Capital Gains Tax etc etc

    • I thought exactly the same thing – Looks very much like a condensation picture usually caused by tenants drying washing in doors and not opening windows

  5. I notice time and time again no reference at all to social housing groups, in my area they are most definitely the worst landlords in the area- the feedback off the many of those tenants is always the same, very negative.
    Due to all the legislation the smaller private landlords are all having to go down the route of putting their properties in the hands of agents- as I will shortly be doing. This group probably represents the majority, by doing this costs of letting escalate very considerably and these costs have to be met by the tenant, so no wonder would be tenants are finding life very hard. Trouble with government it is run by bureaucrats who have no idea how and what makes various business’s work, their answer is fines, licences, and of course taxes. I do ask myself if government really want to improve the housing sector or do they want to take it over. There are undoubtedly bad landlords out there and current legislation is there to cover their type of behaviour but to get to the point sorting it out the tenant has to jump through so many hurdles unless they come under certain categories. On the other hand the social housing basically polices itself!!!! As far as bad tenants go depends on good choice however the tenant is vetted, and luck- getting rid of them is never free of stress at the least and could end up costing you the business. Councils should be the very last resort to get involved as nearly all approach things combatant and tend to favour the tenant ”as all landlords are rogue!’ . One such example is the tenant on benefit, landlords like myself will not take benefit as councils have changed payment rules arbitrarily many times. All the above remarks I hear again and again it seems as though the private landlord is the local whipping boy- not the much needed provider of homes which if viewed from a positive and considerate angle towards both sectors- landlord and tenant without resourcing, as is so often, to the ‘big stick then we might get some sense back in the market.
    I have one mantra and that is charge fairly, give a good level of service and be honest and straightforward with your client- mostly you retain a positive situation and a good name- in all business most sides have to be satisfied to make it work.

  6. I would be all for confiscations, this would be a game changer. Instead of fines or ‘protection’ laws that only hit the tenant in the end – as other commenters already explained.
    The key would be however, as always, the implementation. You get a bonkers tenant like we did who report you to HSE for not having gas cert done (everything was in place), not letting you in to get quotes+fix an upstairs leak, and so on so on… and what, will we be listened to before trialled? would they get bad mark in their files for untrue claims and wasting everyone’s time? this all should work both ways, we good landlords really would be glad to see the rough ones weeded out.

  7. ‘ 200,000 ‘ Physically Abused and Harassed, and…. How many prosecutions have Local Authorities brought ( answers on a postage stamp please.
    There are already ample laws but no enforcement against the most deserving of poor landlords.
    And don’t even get me started on Licensing, as an FOI shows Liverpool carried out LESS Inspections After Licensing than they did before.
    I’ve paid for a Landlords License and seen absolutely no difference over a year later ( apart from the fee missing from my bank account ! )

  8. Great – councils aren’t using the powers they already have, so give them some more to not use !
    But in the very same email linking to this story, just two stories down is one about a Birmingham landlord being fined £180k for exactly the sort of thing that supposedly cannot be tackled effectively.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here