Please Note: This Article is 4 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.

Tenant Fees Ban:

Last week MPs approved the Tenant Fees Bill on its second reading, indicating there is cross party support for the Bill as it stands.

New Housing Secretary, James Brokenshire MP, opening the debate, said that the Bill brings in “essential measures to promote fairness in the private lettings market. It is a Bill that we should all welcome”.

“The Bill will make the market more transparent, yes, but it also has the potential to save tenants—especially young people and families—hundreds of pounds,” Mr Brokenshaw said.

The Bill proposes a cap on damage deposits of six week’s rent, despite some of the homelessness charities vociferously arguing for 4 weeks, but Mr Brokenshaw said this was an “upper limit and not a recommendation.” He thought landlords should reach an appropriate level of deposit depending on the situation at the time, taking into account all the relevant circumstances of the letting.

Mr Brokenshaw pointed out that landlords sometimes needed the financial security of a higher deposit to encourage investment in the sector and the taking on of higher risk tenants.

“The Bill is not an attack on good agents and landlords. We value the important services that they provide, but it will ensure a fair playing field for reputable agents by making it harder for rogues to operate. Letting agents and landlords who represent good value for money will continue to thrive, while those who rely on charging unfair and unjustifiable fees will have to reconsider their business models,” said the Secretary of State.

The Bill also proposes capping holding deposits at one week’s rent.

Whilst there have been objections from the homelessness charities on the issue of so called “default fees”, that is fees that landlords are allowed to charge in the even the tenant defaults on his or her contractual obligations in the tenancy, it was said that they are to be “to be capped at the level of the landlord’s loss.”

The Shadow Minister for the Private Rented Sector (PRS), Melanie Onn MP said:

“A landlord should not be required to pay for a banking or other fine due to a tenant making a payment late or the replacement of a lost key or entry fob.”

Acknowledging that the fee ban could result in higher rents that tenants would have to pay, Chair of the HCLG Select Committee, Clive Betts MP, said that this would be legitimate if “done properly from the beginning, but again there was evidence that if tenants were asked to pay a bit more each month, rather than a lump sum fee, that would help them in most cases. Organisations representing tenants generally accepted that point,” Mr Betts said.

Others expressed the view that double charging, where an agent working for the landlord and the tenant charged them both a fee, was not right.

“The principle has to be that the letting agent acts on behalf of the landlord and that the landlord therefore pays the costs of the agent. Tenants should not be charged for the purposes of identifying a tenancy,” argued Bob Blackman MP, Conservative, Harrow East and a member of the HCLG Committee.

The Bill will now progress to the Committee stage where opportunities for amendments will be given.

Tenant Fees Bill 2017-19

More documents related to the Tenant Fees Bill

Please Note: This Article is 4 years old. This increases the likelihood that some or all of it's content is now outdated.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here