LandlordZONE

26

Nov, 2014

Wednesday

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    14,115

    Default

    Schedule 1 Housing Act 1988
    Tenancies which cannot be assured tenancies
    Resident landlords

    10(1)
    A tenancy in respect of which the following conditions are fulfilled—
    (a)that the dwelling-house forms part only of a building
    and, except in a case where the dwelling-house also forms part of a flat, the building is not a purpose-built block of flats; and
    (b)
    that, subject to Part III of this Schedule, the tenancy was granted by an individual who, at the time when the tenancy was granted, occupied as his only or principal home another dwelling-house which,—
    (i)in the case mentioned in paragraph (a) above,
    also forms part of the flat; or
    (ii)in any other case,
    also forms part of the building; and
    (c)
    that, subject to Part III of this Schedule, at all times since the tenancy was granted the interest of the landlord under the tenancy has belonged to an individual who, at the time he owned that interest, occupied as his only or principal home another dwelling-house which,—
    (i)in the case mentioned in paragraph (a) above,
    also formed part of the flat; or
    (ii)in any other case,
    also formed part of the building; and
    (d)that the tenancy is not one which is excluded from this sub-paragraph by sub-paragraph (3) below.
    I think the bit in red might be what people are getting confused about?

    I'm not entirely sure, but I do not think it says that the LL must live there "at all times". It seems to be saying that the LL must have owned* the rental property "at all times" since the tenancy was granted (and that he must have been living there at the time the tenancy was granted as in 10(1)(b)).

    If I'm right, then I presume this is to address a scenario where the original LL sells the rental property, but the new owner doesn't live in the building, so the tenancy would then cease to fall under para.10.

    * Or perhaps have been the legal LL.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    14,115

    Default

    It should also be borne in mind that Schedule 1 HA1988 only applies to tenancies.

    Quote Originally Posted by westminster View Post
    Schedule 1 Housing Act 1988 is about tenancies which cannot be assured tenancies.

    Paragraph 10 says that if a LL is resident (not necessarily sharing accommodation) when the tenancy is granted, the tenancy cannot be an assured [shorthold or non-shorthold] tenancy.

    The lodger wasn't granted exclusive possession of his room, so he didn't have a tenancy, whether assured or non-assured. He had a licence.

Similar Threads

  1. Lodger Problems
    By Jacqui Collins in forum Residential Letting Questions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-12-2012, 17:19 PM
  2. Lodger Problems
    By IanLee in forum Residential Letting Questions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-11-2012, 22:38 PM
  3. Serious problems getting lodger to leave.
    By Room_Renter in forum Residential Letting Questions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 25-01-2012, 12:17 PM
  4. Problems with lodger (gas usage, TV aerial); do I owe?
    By Nita in forum Residential Letting Questions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-06-2009, 12:42 PM
  5. Resident landlord causing problems for student lodger
    By bikemad in forum Residential Letting Questions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 18-04-2009, 23:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •