LandlordZONE

21

Oct, 2014

Tuesday

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    336

    Default Renting out a property in light of new UC legislation

    H All,

    I regularly work with the council to provide housing to LHA claimants, with years of experience in how the system works, its not actually as bad as some people make it, but of course every case is different and it does have it ups and downs.

    I would like to know what the consensus is on the forum with regards to the new Universal Credit regulation coming next year, I may have a proeprty vacant in the early part of next year and with all my lets, I always insist on direct landlord payments. I know this topic has been covered many times, but I do not see a sticky on the forums with new trends, changes in legislation etc.

    Are there things that I can insist on etc, lastly if an existing LHA claim is such that its been agreed that rent is paid directly to the landlord, can the govt just change that overnight ?

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,342

    Default

    You have an agreement with the tenant that you are paid direct.
    The government are not a party to this contract.
    Stalkers, please go over this comment with a fine tooth comb.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    9,170

    Default

    Dunno what others think but given the record of big government IT projects (terrible, late..) and my assessment of Duncan-Smiff's brain power I doubt UC will come in, in full, on schedule & dear old HB/LHA will carry on a bit longer..

    Hope I'm wrong...
    I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theartfullodger View Post
    I doubt UC will come in, in full, on schedule
    The link below is from Sunday's "The Independent".

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...internalSearch
    These comments assume you are in England/Wales, and that your last tenancy agreement was dated after 6th April 2007.

  5. #5

    Default

    it will be like LHA without the money to make it work in the pilots!!! I remember they spent something like £90 million on the LHA pilot schemes (typical labour)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    524

    Default

    UC sounds like a joke. I hope they are running these schemes up north as the travel agents will have a field day when the tenant receive their £1200 monthly cheques. Idiotic idea, all I hear is the council talking about how succesful this or that was, still waiting to hear the exact figures on how many direct payments fall into tenant arrears because to me it seems like well over 50%

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Petetong View Post
    it will be like LHA without the money to make it work in the pilots!!! I remember they spent something like £90 million on the LHA pilot schemes (typical labour)
    Last time I looked 'labour' were no longer in Government !

    This scheme is from the Coalition.

    ML
    Refer Mad Regulators to Arkell vs Pressdram.

  8. #8

    Default

    i think you missed the point

    they were on about what the labour gov did
    ie 90 mill for pilot schemes

    as i think were all aware who's in govt now


    cheers

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Lanarkshire
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Hi,

    The LHA pilot exercise; the failure of around 30% of tenants handing over the HB between 2008-10; the forced "Westminster Inquiry" in 2010 due to arrears rising dramatically; and the subsequent easements in the "safeguards", including payment of the first cheque in the name of landlords; and the quid pro quo of LHA being re-directed to landlords when they agreed to reduce rents to the LHA level, is as good a "demonstration project" as you'll get. But Coalition Ministers will not acknowledge past "school boy errors" and learn lessons from them.

    The ongoing "demonstrations" have been "doomed to succeed" from day one and not an ounce of truth arising from this exercise will be published. One of the participants broke ranks last week declaring his organisation estimated losses of £8M. In response IDS has advised Parliament that there is minimal problems with only a handful of cases experiencing arrear issues.

    Big egos & reputations are at stake; internecine strife occurs daily at Cabinet meetings with George Osborne but IDS and Lord Freud press on. The good Lord took a pasting at the recent NLA conference where I was his warm up act. PRS landlords rightly challenged his arrogant disregard but the best we can hope for Is UC will be further delayed. Few areas will be affected before April 2014 so hold tight if you're thinking of pressing the ejector button!

    The Universal Credit Regulations and accompanying explanatory note can be accessed on
    http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/welfare...m-regulations/ With numerous sets of associated legislation and explanatory notes so much for simplification.

    HBadvocacy
    www.hbadvice.co.uk
    www.welfarereformsadvice.co.uk

Similar Threads

  1. Renting out our property we live in
    By stockport1965 in forum Finance & Investment Questions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-08-2012, 11:25 AM
  2. renting a property out and day to day job
    By ildigv in forum Tax Questions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 23-08-2011, 18:38 PM
  3. Renting out property and the LVT
    By dd65tn in forum Long Leasehold Questions
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 23-01-2011, 11:45 AM
  4. Legally renting out first property
    By Ammo in forum Residential Letting Questions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16-07-2006, 08:22 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •