LandlordZONE

28

Nov, 2014

Friday

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    1

    Default Can I rent out my flat (that I own)- lease seems to say 'underletting' not allowed?

    Apologies if this is a silly first question, I have searched the forum but can't find a definitive answer.

    I own my flat (i.e. pay a mortgage on it). I am moving into my partner's flat and want to rent mine out. However, my lease says the following:

    "8. That the demised premises shall be kept and used as and for a single private residence in one occupation only"
    "9.That the tenant will not assign transfer or underlet any part only of the demised premises"

    Does this mean I am not allowed to rent out my flat? or does it mean that if I rent it out that whoever I rent it to cannot sublet it?

    If it does mean I cannot rent out my flat, how can I get around this? Can I request a change to the lease? will I need a solicitor to do this?

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    oop north
    Posts
    5,286

    Default

    There are many, many posts on this last month, and previous.
    Try and search for the posts to get answers.
    If problems, of course you are welcome to ask.

    You cannot change the lease. ask the freeholders / managing agent / company
    as to your position, as they have experienc as to what you need to do,
    then check back here.

    R.a.M.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,791

    Default

    It means that you can let the flat out as a whole, but you may not let out only a part of it. You may need to inform your mortgage lender that you intend to let it. You also will have to have a gas inspection and an epc done before you can let it.
    I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Andalucía
    Posts
    9,826

    Default

    No. 8 means that you can only let to a "family", that word having a wide meaning.

    No. 9 just means you cannot let part. If you let the whole you are in the clear - assuming that is that there are no other relevant clauses.

Similar Threads

  1. Tenant disputing date of break clause allowed for in Lease
    By OllieP in forum Commercial Property Questions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-11-2011, 16:28 PM
  2. Allowed relative to use flat - no AST
    By Casonka in forum Residential Letting Questions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30-03-2011, 17:17 PM
  3. 'Single private residence' flat- subletting allowed?
    By junglejim in forum Long Leasehold Questions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 15:01 PM
  4. Does this lease clause bar underletting?
    By ChrisM in forum Long Leasehold Questions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-12-2010, 15:13 PM
  5. Letting to allowed, but flat must only be occupied by single family
    By leaseholder70 in forum Long Leasehold Questions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-09-2009, 14:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •