MRB
25-09-2005, 17:15 PM
Hi,
I'm considering taking an assignment of a commercial lease. I have two questions of procedure/market practice:
(a) the property has a below-market rent (but with a rent review in 3 years). The assignor spent a large sum on renovations and improvements when he took on the property a short time ago which is presumably why he was able to negotiate a low rent at that time. The assignor is now requiring a large premium in recognition of his expenditure and the low rent. The premium basically wipes out the benefit of the low rent AND causes cashflow concerns to my start up business.
Is it usual in such circumstances for the assignor to be able to pass on nearly all the cost of the improvements he made/demand a significant premium for such a limited period of guaranteed low rent? Is it usual to take into account limitations in the lease when negotiating a premium (e.g. limited "use" clause; some other ideal tenant protections missing)?
(b) the second question relates to procedure. Is it normal to first approach the assignor/his agent with an offer for the premium that is subject to the subsequent discussions with the landlord? I don't want to commit to the premium before I find out whether the landlord will want to use his right to request deposit/personal guarantees.
Any thoughts at all would be very welcome.
Best regards
MRB
I'm considering taking an assignment of a commercial lease. I have two questions of procedure/market practice:
(a) the property has a below-market rent (but with a rent review in 3 years). The assignor spent a large sum on renovations and improvements when he took on the property a short time ago which is presumably why he was able to negotiate a low rent at that time. The assignor is now requiring a large premium in recognition of his expenditure and the low rent. The premium basically wipes out the benefit of the low rent AND causes cashflow concerns to my start up business.
Is it usual in such circumstances for the assignor to be able to pass on nearly all the cost of the improvements he made/demand a significant premium for such a limited period of guaranteed low rent? Is it usual to take into account limitations in the lease when negotiating a premium (e.g. limited "use" clause; some other ideal tenant protections missing)?
(b) the second question relates to procedure. Is it normal to first approach the assignor/his agent with an offer for the premium that is subject to the subsequent discussions with the landlord? I don't want to commit to the premium before I find out whether the landlord will want to use his right to request deposit/personal guarantees.
Any thoughts at all would be very welcome.
Best regards
MRB