nick 100
28-01-2008, 09:15 AM
Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can offer advice on the following matter:
I am a landlord. My tenant has given 2 months' notice to leave the proprty at the end of the 6 month tenancy term. The contract between us requires that the tenant allow access to my agents or I, in the last 2 months of the tenancy, for the purpose of conducting viewings with prospective new tenants. The current tenant is only allowing access on 1 day a week for such viewings, making them almost impossible, despite many applications to view the property by prospective tenants.
My question is this:
I fully understand (and agree with) the overriding right of the tenant to deny access to anyone (including myself) during the life of the tenancy, save in very limited circumstances. However, in doing so the tenant is also breaching a term of the contract between us. If her actions effectively prevent viewings before she moves out, and this in turn leads to a delay in new tenants being secured, can I compensate myself for the ensuing financial loss by witholding part of the deposit. (The contract states that the purpose of the deposit is to "pay and compensate the landlord for the reasonable costs of any breach of these [i.e the tenancy agreement] obligations")
I would be grateful if any landlords have had experience of using such a term in the past to withold a tenant's deposit, or advice on why such action may not be possible.
Many thanks for any help or advice offered.:)
Nick
I wonder if anyone can offer advice on the following matter:
I am a landlord. My tenant has given 2 months' notice to leave the proprty at the end of the 6 month tenancy term. The contract between us requires that the tenant allow access to my agents or I, in the last 2 months of the tenancy, for the purpose of conducting viewings with prospective new tenants. The current tenant is only allowing access on 1 day a week for such viewings, making them almost impossible, despite many applications to view the property by prospective tenants.
My question is this:
I fully understand (and agree with) the overriding right of the tenant to deny access to anyone (including myself) during the life of the tenancy, save in very limited circumstances. However, in doing so the tenant is also breaching a term of the contract between us. If her actions effectively prevent viewings before she moves out, and this in turn leads to a delay in new tenants being secured, can I compensate myself for the ensuing financial loss by witholding part of the deposit. (The contract states that the purpose of the deposit is to "pay and compensate the landlord for the reasonable costs of any breach of these [i.e the tenancy agreement] obligations")
I would be grateful if any landlords have had experience of using such a term in the past to withold a tenant's deposit, or advice on why such action may not be possible.
Many thanks for any help or advice offered.:)
Nick