PDA

View Full Version : HMO and Licencing



RJL
29-03-2007, 13:48 PM
I am in the throws of setting up for Landlordzone an almost "Definitive Guide" to HMO.

There seems to be so many people who are still unclear on what is / what is not an HMO what needs a licence and what doe not

Section 254 of the 2004 Housing Act sets out the conditions of the building

Section 258 of the Housibg Act 2004 deals with "Household"

PERSON TO BE REGARDED AS NOT FORMING A SINGLE HOUSEHOLD UNLESS:-
THEY ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THE SAME FAMILY

A member of the same family is defined as:

Those persons married to each other or live together as husband and wife (or in an equivilent relationship in the case of persons of the same sex):
One of them is a relative of the other, or
one of them is, or is a relative of, one member of a couple and the other is a relative of the other member of the couple

Relative means parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, neice or cousin.
A relationship of half blood is treated as a relationship of the whole blood
A stepchild is treated as his child

Occupied mean lived in (Silbers v Southwark LBC 1977) There a vacant house cannot be an HMO untill it is occupied.

So a property that is occupied by 5 or more persons who do not form a single household would need a license.

The council CAN additional lisence premise that are let to 3 or more persons who do not form a single household

The 2004 Housing Act is clear on what you can and what you cannot do

THE ADVICE IS:

DO NOT TRY AN AVOID LICENSING - YOU MAY FACE £20,000 FINE

HAVE TO RETURN ALL THE RENT PAID BY TENANTS
yOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SERVE ANY LEGAL NOTICE ON THE TENANTS - ARREARS OF RENT, SECTION 21, SECTION 8 ETC



BE WARNED

red40
29-03-2007, 16:51 PM
So a property that is occupied by 5 or more persons who do not form a single household would need a license.



Just to add on the important factors onto what RJL has said the property also has to be 3 storey or more and sharing of an amentity.