Wickerman
19-03-2007, 13:00 PM
A hypothetical [almost, anyway] question:
Tenant moves into house. Deposit is lodged with the custodial scheme [1].
Tenant blocks the drains up by pouring fat down the sink. Landlord sends contractor out, who clears the drains. The landlord pays the contractor and tells the tenant that if it happens again they will pay for it.
The tenant again blocks the drains and the contractor goes out again. This time the tenant is told to pay for it. Tenant does not have the money to and is happy for it to be taken out of the deposit. Landlord would normally deduct the money from the deposit, however now the money is lodged with the custodial scheme.
Does the landlord instruct the tenant deposit scheme to return part of the money to him? Would the custodial scheme allow for this given that the tenancy has not ended?
We run into this scenario fairly frequently and wonder how this would work with the new arrangments.
[1] Providing it starts on time!
Tenant moves into house. Deposit is lodged with the custodial scheme [1].
Tenant blocks the drains up by pouring fat down the sink. Landlord sends contractor out, who clears the drains. The landlord pays the contractor and tells the tenant that if it happens again they will pay for it.
The tenant again blocks the drains and the contractor goes out again. This time the tenant is told to pay for it. Tenant does not have the money to and is happy for it to be taken out of the deposit. Landlord would normally deduct the money from the deposit, however now the money is lodged with the custodial scheme.
Does the landlord instruct the tenant deposit scheme to return part of the money to him? Would the custodial scheme allow for this given that the tenancy has not ended?
We run into this scenario fairly frequently and wonder how this would work with the new arrangments.
[1] Providing it starts on time!