angyb
25-09-2006, 09:18 AM
I am a small agent and one of my Landlords is in a mess financially. She asked me to serve notice on her tenant for the wrong dates. I sent her a letter correcting her and asking for confirmation that she wanted me to proceed with the new notice and dates.
I then had a phonecall from the tenant saying a man had served him with a notice, and it seems she went ahead of her own accord and instructed her ex-husband to serve the wrong notice on the tenant.
I know the ex-husband from previous dealings so I rang him to find out his part in all of this. He is a local landlord with a number of properties so as a favour to to ex-wife agreed to help her out by serving notice for her. I explained to him that the dates on the notice were wrong and he insisted they were right as the tenant moved in in April. I advised him that the tenancy did not in fact start until June!. He told me he had been misled by his ex-wife.
I have since received a letter from the Landlady stating that her ex-husband now has power of attorney, and enclosing a copy of a new notice that they have served on the tenant.
My questions are as follows:
Should I demand to see a copy of the Power of Attorney?
Would the POA overide anything in the Housing Act, or is she still responsible for the tenancy, given that her name is down as Landlord?
The 'new' notice served to my knowledge is invalid for a number of reasons:
i) they have served a Section 21 (4) (a) for a periodic tenancy. The tenant is still in the first 6 months of a fixed term!
ii) They have inserted both of their names as Landlords, even though the tenancy agreement states only her name.
iii) The notice is lacking the prescribed information and refers to many notes none of which have been included.
I have told the tenant that as far as I am concerned this notice is not worth the paper it is written on, and given the lack of communication between the Landlords and myself, they won't respond to phonecalls only texts - I don't feel obliged to point out that the notice they have served is incorrect. Am I wrong. As her agent should I point out that they have served the wrong notice, even if they went behind my back.
To be honest my concern now is for the tenant and to find him suitable accommodation, obviously by not stating the invalidity of the notice, this buys him more time.
Any ideas or comment please.
I then had a phonecall from the tenant saying a man had served him with a notice, and it seems she went ahead of her own accord and instructed her ex-husband to serve the wrong notice on the tenant.
I know the ex-husband from previous dealings so I rang him to find out his part in all of this. He is a local landlord with a number of properties so as a favour to to ex-wife agreed to help her out by serving notice for her. I explained to him that the dates on the notice were wrong and he insisted they were right as the tenant moved in in April. I advised him that the tenancy did not in fact start until June!. He told me he had been misled by his ex-wife.
I have since received a letter from the Landlady stating that her ex-husband now has power of attorney, and enclosing a copy of a new notice that they have served on the tenant.
My questions are as follows:
Should I demand to see a copy of the Power of Attorney?
Would the POA overide anything in the Housing Act, or is she still responsible for the tenancy, given that her name is down as Landlord?
The 'new' notice served to my knowledge is invalid for a number of reasons:
i) they have served a Section 21 (4) (a) for a periodic tenancy. The tenant is still in the first 6 months of a fixed term!
ii) They have inserted both of their names as Landlords, even though the tenancy agreement states only her name.
iii) The notice is lacking the prescribed information and refers to many notes none of which have been included.
I have told the tenant that as far as I am concerned this notice is not worth the paper it is written on, and given the lack of communication between the Landlords and myself, they won't respond to phonecalls only texts - I don't feel obliged to point out that the notice they have served is incorrect. Am I wrong. As her agent should I point out that they have served the wrong notice, even if they went behind my back.
To be honest my concern now is for the tenant and to find him suitable accommodation, obviously by not stating the invalidity of the notice, this buys him more time.
Any ideas or comment please.