rara
23-08-2006, 21:39 PM
Hi - I hope you can help me.
From reading this forum I believe that the 12 month shorthold tenancy agreement which I signed has unfair terms. The most obvious of these are:
tenant agrees that any rent payment over 14 days late is instant eviction for the tenant
provideed that if the rent or any instalments or part thereof shall be in arrears for at least fourteen days after the same shall become due (whether legally demanded or not) or if there shall be a breach of any of the obligations on the part of the Tenant contained herein the Landlord may re-enter on the property (subject always to any statutory restrictions on his part to do so) and immediately thereupon the tenancy shall absolutely determine without prejudice to the other rights and remedies of the Landlord.
The landlord may recover possession of the property and the tenancy will come to an end. Any other rights or remedies the Landlord may have will remain in force
The landlord will give all/ any tenant a minimum of 30 days notice period if they need to repossess the property for any reason
If these are unfair terms what would people suggest I do, I don't have a good relationship with the manager of the property (the landlord lives overseas) so wouldn't want to bring it up, if I wanted to officially complain who would I complain to, the OFT?
I know I could just leave it but I don't like the idea of the landlord using the same contract on future tenants and them thinking they could be evicted after 14 days of not paying rent
Thanks
From reading this forum I believe that the 12 month shorthold tenancy agreement which I signed has unfair terms. The most obvious of these are:
tenant agrees that any rent payment over 14 days late is instant eviction for the tenant
provideed that if the rent or any instalments or part thereof shall be in arrears for at least fourteen days after the same shall become due (whether legally demanded or not) or if there shall be a breach of any of the obligations on the part of the Tenant contained herein the Landlord may re-enter on the property (subject always to any statutory restrictions on his part to do so) and immediately thereupon the tenancy shall absolutely determine without prejudice to the other rights and remedies of the Landlord.
The landlord may recover possession of the property and the tenancy will come to an end. Any other rights or remedies the Landlord may have will remain in force
The landlord will give all/ any tenant a minimum of 30 days notice period if they need to repossess the property for any reason
If these are unfair terms what would people suggest I do, I don't have a good relationship with the manager of the property (the landlord lives overseas) so wouldn't want to bring it up, if I wanted to officially complain who would I complain to, the OFT?
I know I could just leave it but I don't like the idea of the landlord using the same contract on future tenants and them thinking they could be evicted after 14 days of not paying rent
Thanks