Muffin
11-06-2006, 13:24 PM
I have a flat purchased in June 02 (therefore qualify for extending lease) for £73.5k and now valued at £135k.
The original Lease started in 1991 for 99 years (84 years left in 2006).
Ground rent details £10 for 33yrs, then £20 for 33yrs, then £30 for 33yrs.
Its a lovely apartment and although I have no plans to move at the moment, I am concerned about problems concerning saleability if selling once the lease drops below 80 years. (Is this unfounded?)
From what I have read if I applied for a lease extension now it would be much cheaper than if the lease was less than 80 years (ie no marriage value content), however the current market value would not be enhanced by doing so.
The question: Is it worth extending the lease if say I only kept the flat for the next 4-10 years and where would a breakeven occur?
Would the cost of extending the lease by 90 years (whatever it may be) outweigh the return or should I say drop in asset value as time goes by.
Any views welcome.
The original Lease started in 1991 for 99 years (84 years left in 2006).
Ground rent details £10 for 33yrs, then £20 for 33yrs, then £30 for 33yrs.
Its a lovely apartment and although I have no plans to move at the moment, I am concerned about problems concerning saleability if selling once the lease drops below 80 years. (Is this unfounded?)
From what I have read if I applied for a lease extension now it would be much cheaper than if the lease was less than 80 years (ie no marriage value content), however the current market value would not be enhanced by doing so.
The question: Is it worth extending the lease if say I only kept the flat for the next 4-10 years and where would a breakeven occur?
Would the cost of extending the lease by 90 years (whatever it may be) outweigh the return or should I say drop in asset value as time goes by.
Any views welcome.