ziggy2008
14-08-2009, 09:36 AM
Hello. My tenant has moved out after two years. The letting was self managed, agent was find only and the check-out report was done by Lets Inventory last week. I am not sure about the ££ deductions to request re some items so am looking for input re what is reasonable. Of course the ex tenants may dispute the amounts anyway.
Schedule of Condition at Check out - General Condition - Property found neat and tidy. Reasonably well looked after during two year tenancy and ready for check out.
Specific queries:
Living Room Curtails ''lining water stained'' - I assume window left open while rained - dry cleaning of curtains reasonable ??
Window blind ''cord not working & detached from roller'' - probably £20 to get local shop to come out & fix - Reasonable ??
Ceiling mounted shade ''shade has 2 inch chip'' Can I charge for replacement ?
Mattress ''three small blood stains & piling. Requires clean'' Report note said they only looked at the sides-I'll check this properly tomorrow. I'm unhappy at this, ideally I'd like to charge for new mattress but doubt if I can. Could I make any deduction? It wasn't new when first let but was clean, no stains,marks or blood - a new tenant would read a pre-let report and think ''gross'' if I can't get these blood marks out.
White enamel bath ''chip by waste''. Should I let this go?
Timber door frames ''one inch, two inch & three inch flakes on 2 doors''. Should I let these go?
Kitchen work surface '' one inch burn mark in front of sink'' - Presumerably I can't charge for new worktop but it's what I'd like to do ?
The above are all ''T'' noted deficiencies, also not fair ware & tear - per Lets. There are many others that I'll let go so I'm not being pedantic plus some missing items that I will charge for. Plus I'm not going to charge for cleaning as agreed with tenant (building works locally).Thing is with the bath & kitchen worktop - I was getting a pretty good rent as this is a Central London flat and it was reasonably top-end. If I re-let with chip to bath, burned work-top, door chips etc,it's starting to be ''shabby'' not pristine any more.If I replace to get it back to pristine, then I'm out of pocket. Just looking to see what's ''acceptable'' in these circumstances.
Schedule of Condition at Check out - General Condition - Property found neat and tidy. Reasonably well looked after during two year tenancy and ready for check out.
Specific queries:
Living Room Curtails ''lining water stained'' - I assume window left open while rained - dry cleaning of curtains reasonable ??
Window blind ''cord not working & detached from roller'' - probably £20 to get local shop to come out & fix - Reasonable ??
Ceiling mounted shade ''shade has 2 inch chip'' Can I charge for replacement ?
Mattress ''three small blood stains & piling. Requires clean'' Report note said they only looked at the sides-I'll check this properly tomorrow. I'm unhappy at this, ideally I'd like to charge for new mattress but doubt if I can. Could I make any deduction? It wasn't new when first let but was clean, no stains,marks or blood - a new tenant would read a pre-let report and think ''gross'' if I can't get these blood marks out.
White enamel bath ''chip by waste''. Should I let this go?
Timber door frames ''one inch, two inch & three inch flakes on 2 doors''. Should I let these go?
Kitchen work surface '' one inch burn mark in front of sink'' - Presumerably I can't charge for new worktop but it's what I'd like to do ?
The above are all ''T'' noted deficiencies, also not fair ware & tear - per Lets. There are many others that I'll let go so I'm not being pedantic plus some missing items that I will charge for. Plus I'm not going to charge for cleaning as agreed with tenant (building works locally).Thing is with the bath & kitchen worktop - I was getting a pretty good rent as this is a Central London flat and it was reasonably top-end. If I re-let with chip to bath, burned work-top, door chips etc,it's starting to be ''shabby'' not pristine any more.If I replace to get it back to pristine, then I'm out of pocket. Just looking to see what's ''acceptable'' in these circumstances.