jghomer
31-03-2005, 20:17 PM
I have inherited a tenant whom I believed to be on an AST.
He signed with the previous owner in 1993, and the S20 Notice and AST appear to be in order.
The tenant is however trying to insist he is an Assured Tenant on the grounds that he signed the S20 AFTER the AST on the same day in 1993.
I am aware that the Housing Act 1988 only stipulates that the S20 must be issued BEFORE the AST is agreed, and does not state that it must be on a different date. I am sure that many landlords, myself included, have completed both documents on the same date but at different times (And the S20 first!)
As the previous owner/landlord is dead I have no way of proving that the papers were signed in the correct order. I do however find it quite staggering to believe that a tenant can remember the order of signing of 2 documents on a given date 12 years ago! I see it purely as a convenient way of the tenant trying to invalidate his AST. Would a court see this in the same light or would the responsibility be on me to prove the order of signing? (Which I can't possibly do)
Thanks in advance for any helpful feedback.
He signed with the previous owner in 1993, and the S20 Notice and AST appear to be in order.
The tenant is however trying to insist he is an Assured Tenant on the grounds that he signed the S20 AFTER the AST on the same day in 1993.
I am aware that the Housing Act 1988 only stipulates that the S20 must be issued BEFORE the AST is agreed, and does not state that it must be on a different date. I am sure that many landlords, myself included, have completed both documents on the same date but at different times (And the S20 first!)
As the previous owner/landlord is dead I have no way of proving that the papers were signed in the correct order. I do however find it quite staggering to believe that a tenant can remember the order of signing of 2 documents on a given date 12 years ago! I see it purely as a convenient way of the tenant trying to invalidate his AST. Would a court see this in the same light or would the responsibility be on me to prove the order of signing? (Which I can't possibly do)
Thanks in advance for any helpful feedback.