b81563
01-07-2009, 21:07 PM
Hi, I wonder if anyone can help with my tax-related questions. I have got different advice / inpressions from what I have looked into so far.
As background....
I used to have a mortgage on my current home of £75k. When time came to update my mortgage I requested one for £200k to enable me to buy a flat. There was sufficient equity in my home so, rather than get a buy-to-let mortgage, the mortgage adviser arranged a flexible 200k mortgage on my current home that gave me 75k up front for my house remortage needs and an option for an additional £125k to buy the flat at a later date. I actually bought the flat and began renting it out 2 years later (1 year ago). At this time the flat was valued at £145k. My mortgage is now the full 200k.
I would appreciate your view on my tax position....
Firstly, is it true that, whilst the mortgage is 'registered' against my home, because I have used some of it to purchase a flat, then I can claim for tax relief on the mortgage interest related to the flat's market value? And that, given that the flat was valued at £145k at the time of renting, that I can claim tax relating to interest on a £145k loan rather than the £125k that I originally paid for the flat?
Am I obliged to provide proof of value at the time I started renting it out?
Secondly, the flat has been bought by my wife and I together, and the motgage is also in both our names. I work and am just in the 40% tax bracket - my wife does not work. I understand we can decide how to split the profit / loss on the flat. Currently, given the rental market / financial situation I am accepting below market rent (£500 now vs previous £600 / month). Whilst my mortgage is low (c.140/month for the flat-related element) I do expect this to rise again to, say, 500 or 600 per month as interest rates rise in the future. I have about £1k / yr service charge etc. to pay on the flat. This suggests to me that I may not make profit on the rental in a given year, e.g. :
Rent 12x500 = 6000
Mortgage, assume 6000 nominally
Ground rent / service charge = 1000
Wear and Tear @10% = 600
The above would give me a loss, and with higher rent, it would be touch-and-go as to loss or profit. I am basically assuming we would look for future capital growth.
Therefore, given I am a 40% tax payer, I feel that any profit / loss should be 100% against me - if there's a loss I get 40% relief on it. If my thinking is correct on the last point.... would the fact that I'd associated 100% of profit / loss to myself then carry over to any capital gain in the future should we sell the flat. (i.e. would 100% capital gains be related to me rather than say a 50/50 split with my wife).
I am due to see an accountant tomorrow to do my tax retrun but I feel I have now done most of it - but for the 2 questions above. So not sure if it is a waste of money as I wonder what else an accountant would do (do they know answers to these sorts of questions?).
I hope the above is clear and that you are able to advise me. Thanks. Nick
As background....
I used to have a mortgage on my current home of £75k. When time came to update my mortgage I requested one for £200k to enable me to buy a flat. There was sufficient equity in my home so, rather than get a buy-to-let mortgage, the mortgage adviser arranged a flexible 200k mortgage on my current home that gave me 75k up front for my house remortage needs and an option for an additional £125k to buy the flat at a later date. I actually bought the flat and began renting it out 2 years later (1 year ago). At this time the flat was valued at £145k. My mortgage is now the full 200k.
I would appreciate your view on my tax position....
Firstly, is it true that, whilst the mortgage is 'registered' against my home, because I have used some of it to purchase a flat, then I can claim for tax relief on the mortgage interest related to the flat's market value? And that, given that the flat was valued at £145k at the time of renting, that I can claim tax relating to interest on a £145k loan rather than the £125k that I originally paid for the flat?
Am I obliged to provide proof of value at the time I started renting it out?
Secondly, the flat has been bought by my wife and I together, and the motgage is also in both our names. I work and am just in the 40% tax bracket - my wife does not work. I understand we can decide how to split the profit / loss on the flat. Currently, given the rental market / financial situation I am accepting below market rent (£500 now vs previous £600 / month). Whilst my mortgage is low (c.140/month for the flat-related element) I do expect this to rise again to, say, 500 or 600 per month as interest rates rise in the future. I have about £1k / yr service charge etc. to pay on the flat. This suggests to me that I may not make profit on the rental in a given year, e.g. :
Rent 12x500 = 6000
Mortgage, assume 6000 nominally
Ground rent / service charge = 1000
Wear and Tear @10% = 600
The above would give me a loss, and with higher rent, it would be touch-and-go as to loss or profit. I am basically assuming we would look for future capital growth.
Therefore, given I am a 40% tax payer, I feel that any profit / loss should be 100% against me - if there's a loss I get 40% relief on it. If my thinking is correct on the last point.... would the fact that I'd associated 100% of profit / loss to myself then carry over to any capital gain in the future should we sell the flat. (i.e. would 100% capital gains be related to me rather than say a 50/50 split with my wife).
I am due to see an accountant tomorrow to do my tax retrun but I feel I have now done most of it - but for the 2 questions above. So not sure if it is a waste of money as I wonder what else an accountant would do (do they know answers to these sorts of questions?).
I hope the above is clear and that you are able to advise me. Thanks. Nick