View Full Version : Is it an HMO if landlord is resident?
mollysbb
31-08-2008, 08:01 AM
Right, Im sure this sounds daft, but if I buy a huge house and live in it, but rent out rooms, so the tenants are sharing facilities, does this constitute an hmo?
Cheers
Molly
attilathelandlord
31-08-2008, 09:54 AM
landlord plus 2 lodgers = no HMO
landlord plus more than 2 lodgers = HMO
jeffrey
31-08-2008, 20:52 PM
Are you sure? If L is resident, and lodgers are therefore not separate-unit occupiers, is it not then still a single household?
attilathelandlord
01-09-2008, 07:57 AM
Yes I am sure.
masnowdrop13@hotmail
09-09-2008, 15:07 PM
If I rent out 3 rooms to lodgers (one room en-suite) and my son stays in the property do I need an HMO? I live in Scotland
jeffrey
09-09-2008, 15:26 PM
If I rent out 3 rooms to lodgers (one room en-suite) and my son stays in the property do I need an HMO? I live in Scotland
Warning: Scottish law is different from E&W where most LZ members are.
Matthew Moody
09-09-2008, 18:11 PM
I agree with Jeffrey - the Scottish Law requires all landlords to register before renting out rooms - whether you are resident or not.
Also, Attila is correct regarding the live-in situation - as soon as you hit 2 or more in a HMO, then it is classified as a HMO per the normal regulations - 2 or more unrelated households is a HMO.
Obviously if you have a HMO with 3 or 4 in then the health and safety regulations are less, but you will still have to adhere to them.
The only way I have heard of a landlord going around this is where the entire house lives as a household - ie they cook together, walk the dog, breakfast is provided etc. But I wouldn't rely on it as the councils are tightening up where they can.
regards
Matthew
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.