Sharp rises in subscriptions will kick in shortly for agents using the Tenancy Deposit Scheme, as a new charging system comes into force.
EstatAgentToday.co.uk – Wednesday 25th November 2009
This will mean no more flat fees, with subscriptions varying from firm to firm. Exact details will be announced in January.
The changes are because of the huge rise in disputes having to be determined by the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) service also offered under the scheme. As reported, all external case examiners, who are a mixture of freelancers and contract workers, have already been dispensed with. Altogether, some 70 posts were affected, leaving a team of just 12 case examiners in-house – despite the escalating number of disputes.
As a result, disputes are likely to take longer to be resolved, although a spokesman for the scheme said this may not necessarily be the case.
Subscriptions for agents will now be determined on what the scheme describes as a fairer basis, which will reflect individual firms’ use of ADS.
John Hornsey, chairman of the board of The Disputes Service, which runs the TDS, said: “We are moving to a charge which will be based on the number of live tenancies and with discounts and uplifts to members that will reflect the number of cases referred. We shall base our calculations for subscription increases on this method.”
The board says that under the new system and despite the likely severity of the subscription increases, letting agents registered with TDS will be able to control their costs of deposit protection and still be able to off-set the cost. That is because scheme rules and the legislation allow agents to pass on the cost to landlord clients.
“This major change in the method of charging also means that agents should start checking their own tenancy schedules sooner rather than later to ensure that all tenancies that have ended are also closed on the TDS database.











So, we are due to receive a WORSE service than we currently get (some think that it can’t get any worse)and will be expected to pay MORE for the privilege.
Thats totally ridiculous.
Comment by Norfolk N' Chance — 25/11/2009 #