<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>FAQ - LandlordZONE - The five questions posted most recently:</title>
<description>FAQ of rental property knowledge and landlording from LandlordZONE</description>
<link>http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/FAQ</link>	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Tenant Black Lists. I've had a very bad experience with a tenant and would like to put him on a black list so that other landlords don't have the same experience that I've had. How do I go about this?]]></title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We often get asked this question.</p><p>Although there have been several attempts by different organisations in the UK to build data bases which hold delinquent tenant information, to our knowledge none of these have been entirely satisfactory or successful. There are several reasons for this:</p><p>There's always two sides to every story (dispute) and peoples' emotions get involved which blows things up, sometimes out of proportion.</p><p>The only sure way a tenant can be added to such a list is if they have been challenged in court and found guilty, so to speak. Otherwise its one word against another.</p><p>As it is, very few tenant disputes actually come to court or go through a full dispute resolution process.</p><p>Discrimination, Human Rights and Data Protection laws have a bearing here, so these actions could have legal repercussions.</p><p>In any event, even if we were to put delinquent tenants (or even delinquent landlords) on such a list, how long should they stay there? Who decides who goes on and who comes off and when?</p><p>The process is frought with legal difficulties. Our advice would be to thoroughly vet your new tenants each time you re-let by having credit checks and referencing carried out and doing indentity checks. </p><p>If there are any doubts, don't enter into an agreement, take rent up-front or take a guarantor. </p><p>Always do credit checks, referencing and identity checks.</p><p>See: <a title="20 Steps to Successful Letting" href="/successful_landlording.htm" target="_blank">20 Steps to Successful Letting</a></p><p><em><font size="1">Note: never rely totally on these standard answers. Before taking action or not, always seek professional advice with the full facts of the case and all documents to hand. LandlordZONE.co.uk</font></em></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/FAQ/index.php?action=artikel&amp;cat=2&amp;id=60&amp;artlang=en</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:16 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Home Information Packs - Do HIPS apply to Letting?]]></title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="post_message_69731">Here's a potted summary of Part 5 of Housing Act 2004. All numbers relate to its sections.<br /><br />148: It applies to residential property in E&amp;W (i.e. a single house/flat, inc. ancillary land) for occupation as dwelling (inc. if still being built).<br />149: Property is 'on the market' once its availability for sale is made public.<br />150: Defines "acting as estate agent."<br />151-154: Set out rules re responsibility re marketing.<br />154-159: Impose duty ("Duty") to have a HIP and provide it to prospective P.<br />160: Excepts, from Duty, a property not being sold with vacant possession.<br />161: Contemplates further exceptions from Duty.<br />162: Permits suspension of Duty.<br />163: Authorises Reulations (by SI) prescribing HIP contents.<br />164/165: HIP contents may include Home Condition Report, the only novel item. It was the EU's foisting of this on the UK that induced HMG to add-on all the other gubbins unnecessarily. A Register of HCRs may be kept- bet that's an excitig read.<br />166-170: Local authority can prosecute for breach of Duty; P can commission own HIP at cost of whoever should have complied with Duty.<br />171:If two or more units of sub-divided building are for sale together, the fact that part is not on sale individually is irrelevant as long as that part has vacant possession.<br />172-174: Authorise redress schemes which estate agents can be compelled to join.<br /><br />Note that HIPS apply only to sales, not lettings, although the equivalent of HCRs will soon apply to lettings.</div><div></div><div></div><div><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/ukpga_20040034_en_1.htm" target="_blank">Housing Act 2004</a></div><div></div><div></div><div><a href="http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/homeinformation" target="_blank">Home Information Pack Regulations 2006</a></div><!-- / message --><!-- sig --><div><br />JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert]<br />GOOD NEWS: for paid private professional advice, contact me using details on the "Topic Expert" page.<br />BAD NEWS: free public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to clients. </div><div><em><font size="1"></font></em></div><div><em><font size="1">Note: never rely totally on these standard answers. Before taking action or not, always seek professional advice with the full facts of the case and all documents to hand. LandlordZONE.co.uk</font></em></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/FAQ/index.php?action=artikel&amp;cat=2&amp;id=59&amp;artlang=en</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Lease Assignment - I need to get out of a business lease. I have a flower shop which I lease from my landlord. The lease I originally signed was a standard law society lease for 5 years. I have been there for 2 years and now the business has grown so I need to expand and therefore have secured larger premises. What is the norm here? I appreciate that I have signed for 5 years but I have been a good tenant (I have installed full central heating etc) paid rent on time etc, etc. I am prepared to give my landlord 2-3 months notice to re-let the property so I was just wondering what happens normally.

]]></title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The usual practise in this situation is to assign your lease. </p><p>What you have got to appreciate with a commercial lease is that for the term of the lease you are for all intents and purposes the "owner" of the property, pretty much the same as if you were paying a mortgage to the bank, except you are paying rent to a landlord.<br /><br />With these "ownership" rights go all the other obligations, which mean you are responsible to pay the rent to the end of your term, and meet all the other covenants, come what may.<br /><br />Break clauses, if you have one, cannot always be relied on to get you out - see:<br /><a href="/FAQ/index.php?action=artikel&cat=6&id=53&artlang=en" target="_blank"><font color="#22229c">http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/FAQ/in...=53&amp;artlang=en</font></a><br /><br />Speak nicely to your landlord - he might just let you off the hook, especially if he had other opportunities to hand, but usually this would be unlikely.<br /><br />Try to negotiate a cash settlement - buy your way out. This is one option I have given my tenants in the past and they have sometimes been happy to do this on a mutually agreed compensation or lease surrender fee.<br /><br />The best option for the tenant though is to contact the local agents and put the property on the market - to let. You may even be able to get a premium for the lease if you are lucky?<br /><br />The landlord is obliged to agree to an assignment without undue delay and providing the new tenant meets similar criteria to the original in terms of credit checks / references etc and appropriate use. Indeed, it's in a landlord's interest to assist.<br /><br />You will of course be obliged to pay all letting and legal costs, both yours and the landlords for a deed of assignment.<!-- / message --></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/FAQ/index.php?action=artikel&amp;cat=6&amp;id=58&amp;artlang=en</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Break Clause. I am negotiating to take a lease with a break clause so that I can get out of the lease if my new business fails. Are there any points I should be aware of?]]></title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Break clauses are not as straighforward as one might at first sight imagine. </p><p>Whilst it is undoubtably sensible that a tenant with a new business insist on a break clause in longer leases, it is not always a straightforward matter to enforce the break.</p><p>Case law shows that it is not always possible to exercise the break because leases invariably stipluate that all the lease covenants and notice deadlines must be strictly complied with. </p><p>Given the number of covenants in a standard commercial lease, which may run for up to 50 pages, it's almost always possible for the landlord to find something the tenant has not fully complied with. </p><p>When a tenant signs a new lease he should therefore always assume that he will be liable for the full rent for all of the term.  </p><p>Case law is now fairly well settled on this principle that a break clause can only be exercised by a tenant if the terms of the lease have been fully complied with when issuing the break notice. </p><p>If the tenant is in breach of just one of the obligations the break notice may be ineffective and because timings of notices are often quite specific it is usually not possible to remedy the breach in the timescale available. </p><p>It may be possible to negotiate a break clause based on "substantial compliance with" or "no material breach of" the covenants, but the uncertainty this introduces is almost as bad as the former case, and could be very expensive to resolve in a dispute.</p><p>So, landlords and tenants should be aware that leases with conditional break clauses may be fraught with difficulties and that break clauses may not always be effective. </p><p><em><font size="1">Note: never rely totally on these standard answers. Before taking action or not, always seek professional advice with the full facts of the case and all documents to hand. LandlordZONE.co.uk</font></em></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/FAQ/index.php?action=artikel&amp;cat=6&amp;id=53&amp;artlang=en</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:20:33 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Code for Leasing Business Premises - what is this code?]]></title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Code for Leasing Business Premises in England and Wales 2007 is the result of collaboration between commercial property professionals and industry bodies representing both owners (Landlords) and occupiers (Tenants).</p><p>The Code aims to promote fairness in commercial leases, and recognises a need to increase awareness of property issues, especially among small businesses, ensuring that occupiers of business premises have the information necessary to negotiate the best deal available to them.</p><p>The Code consists of three parts:</p><p>- 10 point requirements for landlords in order for their lease to be Code-compliant; <br />- a guide for occupiers, explaining terms and providing helpful tips; and <br />- a model Heads of Terms (which can be completed on line and downloaded). </p><p>The Code is voluntary so occupiers should be aware that not all Landlords will choose to offer Code-compliant leases. The Government, however, takes a keen interest in ensuring the property industry complies with this voluntary Code.</p><p>The Occupier Guide is not a substitute for professional advice and tenants are encouraged to seek professional advice as soon as possible.</p><p><a title="Code for Leasing Business Premises" href="http://www.leasingbusinesspremises.co.uk./downloads/lbp_booklet.pdf" target="_blank">Download a copy of the code</a></p><p><em><font size="1">Note: never rely totally on these standard answers. Before taking action or not, always seek professional advice with the full facts of the case and all documents to hand. LandlordZONE.co.uk</font></em></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/FAQ/index.php?action=artikel&amp;cat=6&amp;id=57&amp;artlang=en</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>